One of the scholars who has done the most to reveal the discriminatory dimensions of PAR, as it has been implemented in California School Districts, is BAT Research Team member Brian Crowell., Looking at data in the Berkeley, Oakland and San Francisco school districts, Brian Crowell has not only documented a sharp decline in the percentage of Black teachers in all three districts in the last ten years, he has gathered data from the PAR program in all three districts which show that teachers with the greatest seniority have been the ones overwhelmingly placed in that program, making a prima facie case for age discrimination, and quite possibly race discrimination, that may well be the subject of future litigatio
Now Brian Crowell has turned his attention to the Los Angeles Unified School District and has asked for demographic data on teachers in their PAR program. After being stonewalled for several weeks, he received a letter saying he would have to pay $1,200 for the information he requested. Clearly the LAUSD is not anxious to have this data made public. Which suggests that they are not anxious for people to see the age and race distribution of teachers referred to PAR. Here is Brian Crowell's memo on his Los Angeles data request:
My name is Brian Crowell. I am a member of the CTA Union. On
September 11, 2014 I made a Public Records Request to the Los Angeles Unified
School District. I requested the age, race, gender and placement on salary
schedule for teachers referred to Peer Assistance and Review. I request the
calendar years of 2003-2013 for this data.
Los Angeles Unified School District responded to my query on
October 10th, 2014. In their letter to me, LAUSD stated that they would comply
with my request if I paid a fee of $1,200.00 for compiling the data into an
electronic format. The Public Records Act does allow for the institution to
charge for the labor to compile the information, however $1,200.00 is
absolutely outrageous!
My theory. The time period of a month to respond to my query
tells me the LAUSD legal department was trying to find a way to exempt
disclosure. I have no evidence of this. The data itself, I believe will suggest
massive age discrimination particularly of teachers over the age of 46. I think
the $1,200.00 fee is to also dissuade me from getting the information.
I have been in contact with members of the UTLA Leadership who
have shown interest in this issue. I hope they help me in endeavor to obtain
this information.
Brian Crowell's research calls for a very careful analysis, by local and national leaders of teachers unions,ly, whether this highly touted program has been used in a discriminatory fashion. It is not unknown for once promising ideas that teachers unions supported to be corrupted in implementation. Just look at Charter Schools.
3 comments:
As a 26-year LAUSD vet (retired), no malfeasance on the part of the central "suits" surprises me. Deasy wants the vets out. His despicable removal of the legendary and revered Iris Stevenson from Crenshaw sent a clear signal that no one is safe and that all should fear him.
I did witness PAR make a difference for a woman who entered teaching as a second career, had done a few years in a church-run private school, and was not a good fit for the high school to which she was assigned. The two PAR teachers who worked with her made a huge difference. The following year she transferred to a magnet middle school, which was a much better fit for her.
Raj Patwari Recruitment Form
Raj Patwari Bharti Application Form
Rajasthan Patwari Bharti
REET Exam 2015 CDP Syllabus {L1 & L2}
REET Exam 2015 Level 1 {L1} Syllabus
REET Exam 2015 Level 2 {L2} Syllabus
SSC MTS Answer Key 2015
HSSC JE Answer Key 2015
govt. Jobs
CBSE 12th Arts Result
CBSe Science Xllth Result
BIEAP 12th class Result
BIEAP plus 2 Arts Result
BIEAP 10+2 Commerce Result
AHSEC 12th Commerce Result
Post a Comment