As long as there is a
huge concentration of wealth at the top of the society, as we have now in the
US, we cannot assume that centralized government initiatives will have positive
consequences. Government at all levels has become the tool of powerful
corporations. This makes the historic
socialist identification with strong government highly problematical. In the US
today, policies which are egalitarian in intent often become the opposite in
implementation because large corporations make themselves the prime
beneficiaries. I think we have to pursue egalitarian policies at the local
level, through democratic means, while also respecting peoples hunger for
greater freedom and control over their lives.
The irony is that some
people who respond positively to the idea of "socialism" have a
libertarian side as well- they oppose repressive drug laws, stop and frisk,
restrictions on personal liberty in areas ranging from gun laws to religion, and
resent surveillance
control and authoritarian rule every aspect of their lives, from the work
place, to their neighborhood, to the schools their children attend. You cannot
have freedom in a society where large corporations have this much power and
bend the government to their will. You have to smash the power of the large
corporations and at the same time give people greater freedom in their schools
neighborhoods, and workplaces. We need much more equality and much more
freedom. Developing the policies that do this positively will be the challenge
of the next 30 years.
In the meantime, we
fight to get the boot of the large corporations and the state off our necks
when they work in tandem to simultaneously suppress personal liberty and funnel
greater wealth to the very top. The Common Core standards are a prime example
of this. They have simultaneously stripped away local control of public schools
while funneling huge amounts of public money to corporations who develop tests
and curricular materials. They are promoted in the name of public good, but
result in restrictions on teachers, and pressures on students and families,
which wealthy elites are exempt from because their children do not attend
public schools
That is the negative
side. On the positive side, we need much stronger unions, we need much stronger
community organizations, we need to fight for greater freedom from surveillance
and control, and we need to develop policies which encourage small businesses
and cooperative enterprises.
Also, we need to be
vigilant about policies which attack government power only to enhance corporate
power. Beware of those who attack trade unions in the name of enhancing
personal freedom. Trade unions are the ordinary citizens most powerful
protection against the excesses of great wealth. Weakening them, as we have
done for the last 30 years, has contributed greatly to the plutocratic society
we live in now.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment